- 46
- Posts
- 14
- Years
- Australia
- Seen Feb 24, 2013
People always bring up how most Legendaries can't lay eggs and are genderless, and there always seems to be some argument about whether Mew "giving birth" to Mewtwo was a factual account and not a misinterpretation.
I propose that though the majority of Pokémon are divided into Egg Groups, the Legendary Pokemon instead give birth to live young in a similar vein to Mammals, and that is precisely why there aren't as many Legendaries as there are common Pokemon. In a world of rising battles, the live birth style of existing is dying out in the Pokémon world, even if it does bring about a more powerful being.
Legendaries with Genders must breed with their alternate counterpart to produce live offspring, and Legendaries "without genders" are in actuality hermaphroditic and can breed with any of it's species.
The rarity of these births occuring, and why they do not breed when in captivity (Day Care, Pokeballs) is an analogue to the rarity of births in captivity of certain animals.
I propose that though the majority of Pokémon are divided into Egg Groups, the Legendary Pokemon instead give birth to live young in a similar vein to Mammals, and that is precisely why there aren't as many Legendaries as there are common Pokemon. In a world of rising battles, the live birth style of existing is dying out in the Pokémon world, even if it does bring about a more powerful being.
Legendaries with Genders must breed with their alternate counterpart to produce live offspring, and Legendaries "without genders" are in actuality hermaphroditic and can breed with any of it's species.
The rarity of these births occuring, and why they do not breed when in captivity (Day Care, Pokeballs) is an analogue to the rarity of births in captivity of certain animals.