- 42,763
- Posts
- 18
- Years
- She/Her
- Scotland
- Seen today
How strongly do you care about optimal/competitively built Pokémon?
Now that is a hot take.I think IVs are one of the worst things in the entire franchise.
Now that is a hot take.
I do care, and I'll look for and breed for better Pokémon overall with good IVs and hopefully shiny!
I do care too if I'm playing a difficult game and I have no choice, but that doesn't make the mechanic good. It's an awful mechanic that only exists to make players waste a lot of time until they finally breed the chosen one, after who knows how many defective breeds sent to the trash can.
Not having perfect or near-perfect IVs make a lot of difference in the battle tower
This is the only part of it that I come down on the negative side of the argument for. Like I took a Vaporeon with 9 / 6 / 0 / 7 / 9 / 16 IVs through my HeartGold save and it still took out half of Lance's team due to type advantages, but it had to be carried just to get a Silver Print in Battle Tower, even with EV training.
At least in Gen IV they did introduce the two levels of success - I've got past 21 battles in Tower with a variety of Pokémon but only made it to 49 with two IV-bred and a pseudo-legendary. In Hoenn it was almost impossible.
I am happy I have the option to mint her to a better nature, reset EVs, and hyper train. But that will involve long grinding hours at the battle tower earning BPs to get the mints, the berries (I'm not planting them, sorry), and bottle caps.
yes unfortunately i care about most of those
IVs not so much during a normal playthrough but for me, natures can make or break a pokemon. :c egg moves are eh, i can live without those depending on the egg moves...