Our software update is now concluded. You will need to reset your password to log in. In order to do this, you will have to click "Log in" in the top right corner and then "Forgot your password?".
Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
I don't know why, but I've specifically been wanting a snow macaque Pokémon for a while now. Munkidori is about the closest we've gotten to one so far, and while I quite like Munkidori because it's funny, it's not quite a "snow" macaque.
I think a cuttlefish Pokémon would be much appreciated as...
Kitakami has Charjabug, so that's really all I could've asked for.
Seriously, though, as someone who's into traditional Japanese aesthetics and folklore, almost too much so, I enjoy Kitakami and its lore. The battles were surprisingly challenging too (if only because I was using a less than...
I'm quite glad that Poltchageist pushes the envelope for convergent Pokémon: whereas the Wiglett and Toedscool lines had the same morphologies as their Kantonian counterparts but were based on completely different concepts, Poltchageist is similar to Sinistea in almost every way, including...
My brother once came across a listing online for Charjabug and Pyukumuku plushies and sent them to me unprompted, and it's because of him that I have them in the first place, so I think my brother knows a decent enough amount about Pokémon to know what my favorites are, but not enough to discuss...
I guess the only thing I'd change about Charjabug would be its color schemes (both normal and Shiny)? They're good and all, but I've never been a big fan of olive or scarlet.
I've had this thought many times when a Pokémon's in-game viability is brought up, and especially in competitive circles, "weak" Pokémon are usually bemoaned, with many people begging for "buffs" so that they might be "worth using," and a similar reaction occurs to the opposite extreme, with...
That's the thing about passive damage, though; in most cases it's based on the percentage of the target's max HP, not the user's attack stat, because let's be real: if passive damage wasn't like this, defensive Pokémon would be much, MUCH more annoying to deal with, especially Steel- and...
No*.
(There is a distinction to be made between glitches and exploits, but for the sake of brevity I'm lumping them together because they're usually given the same treatment.)
I think of it like this: if it's possible in the base game without the use of any external tools, such as Action...
Pretty important, I'd say. I tend to fixate on it, whether to diversify my team, or, conversely, make them all the same type. If I have one, two, or six Pokémon on my team with the same type, I'm fine, but anything other than those three numbers is an oversight on my part.
The starter type combos are limited to one Pokémon/evolutionary line each, and it's especially criminal that the only Water/Fire-type is a Mythical Pokémon. So come on, Game Freak: give the fans what they want. Seriously, the fact that we have only one line of Grass/Water-types is baffling...